nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 05, No.264 22-28
穿越断层时隧道围岩响应规律的模型试验与数值模拟
基金项目(Foundation): 中国铁建昆仑投资集团有限公司科技研究开发计划项目(KLTZ-KX01-2020-009)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

为研究穿越断层破碎带时隧道施工引起的围岩响应,该文以阳宗隧道为背景,配置与普通围岩、断层破碎带、衬砌的基本力学特性相似的模型材料,进行隧道开挖模型试验,同时,建立FLAC3D数值模型作为补充分析。结果表明:1)同一断面径向应力的大小为拱顶>仰拱>拱肩>边墙; 2)断层处各测点压力和围岩变形的变化大于断层前、后相应测点,断层拱顶处竖向累计沉降为22.3 mm,分别是断层前与断层后竖向累计沉降的1.47、1.57倍;3)围岩竖向位移的大小及分布与断层和隧道的相对位置有关,断层位于拱顶上方时,拱顶沉降较大,断层位于仰拱下方时,仰拱隆起较大,且距断层越近变形越大。

Abstract:

In order to study the response of surrounding rock caused by tunnel excavation while crossing fault fracture zones,this paper takes Yangzong Tunnel as the background to carry out tunnel excavation model tests by setting model materials with basic mechanical properties similar to those of ordinary surrounding rock,fault fracture zones,and linings. Meanwhile,a FLAC3D numerical model is established as a supplementary analysis. The results show that:( 1) The radial stress in the same cross-section follows the order of arch crown > inverted arch > arch shoulder > side wall.( 2) The changes of surrounding rock pressure and displacement in the fault are greater than those in the corresponding positions before and after the fault. The vertical cumulative settlement at the arch crown is 22. 3 mm,which is 1. 47 times and 1. 57 times the vertical cumulative settlement before and after the fault respectively.( 3) The magnitude and distribution of vertical displacement of surrounding rock are related to the relative position between the fault and the tunnel. When the fault is located above the arch crown,the settlement of the arch crown is large. When the fault is located below the inverted arch,the inverted arch bulge is large,and the closer to the fault,the greater the deformation.

参考文献

[1] Zhao K,Chen W,Yang D,et al. Mechanical tests and engineering applicability of fibre plastic concrete used in tunnel design in active fault zones. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2019,88:200-208.

[2] Kun M,Onargan T. Influence of the fault zone in shallow tunneling:A case study of Izmir Metro Tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2013,33:34-45.

[3]吴昊,杨晓华,陈星宇.富水断层隧道涌水特征试验.长安大学学报(自然科学版),2017,37(5):73-80.

[4]李守刚.减震层对跨断层隧道抗错断效果的模型试验研究.铁道标准设计,2019,063(12):106-111.

[5]任明洋,张强勇,陈尚远,等.复杂地质条件下大埋深隧洞衬砌与围岩协同作用物理模型试验研究.土木工程学报,2019,52(8):98-109.

[6] Zaheri M,Ranjbarnia M,Dias D. 3D numerical investigation of segmental tunnels performance crossing a dipslip fault. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2020, 23(4):351-364.

[7]杜修力,汪振,赵密,等.穿越走滑断层的山岭隧道抗错断铰接设计试验研究.土木工程学报,2022,55(5):97-106.

[8]王天强,崔臻,盛谦,等.走滑断层作用下跨断层隧洞错断模型试验研究.防灾减灾工程学报,2022,42(3):597-605.

[9]昝文博,赖金星,邱军领,等.松散堆积体隧道压力拱效应试验与数值模拟.岩土工程学报,2021,43(9):1666-1674.

[10]颉永斌,董建华.断层破碎带内隧道纵向受荷特征和变形分析.中国公路学报,2021,34(11):211-224.

[11]王杰,盛俭,赵梦丹,等.康西瓦断裂错动对近断层隧道影响的数值模拟分析.地震工程与工程振动,2022,42(3):235-242.

[12]孙浪,欧湘萍,闫志濠,等.断层破碎带地质特征对隧道围岩稳定性的影响研究.武汉理工大学学报,2020,42(3):23-31.

[13]王鸿儒,赵密,钟紫蓝,等.跨断层隧洞拟静力缩尺试验相似材料研究.工程力学,2022,39(6):21-30,145.

[14]田兴朝,刘远明,陶铁军,等.软弱破碎围岩隧道施工力学特性模型试验研究.现代隧道技术,2020,57(5):200-209.

[15]田青峰,袁照辉,张睿,等.高地应力水平岩层隧道岩爆机制研究——以大峡谷隧道为例.隧道建设(中英文),2021,41(增刊1):223-231.

基本信息:

DOI:

中图分类号:U451.2

引用信息:

[1]段成刚,薛方辰,姚崇凯,等.穿越断层时隧道围岩响应规律的模型试验与数值模拟[J].勘察科学技术,2025,No.264(05):22-28.

基金信息:

中国铁建昆仑投资集团有限公司科技研究开发计划项目(KLTZ-KX01-2020-009)

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文