nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 01, No.260 32-38
膨胀土基坑的土体试验性能及变形预测分析
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

为掌握膨胀土的试验性能,合理评价其基坑施工过程中的支护效能,该文以南宁地区膨胀土基坑为研究背景,先通过试验分析掌握膨胀土的抗剪强度及膨胀力规律,再基于基坑现场监测成果,开展其力学监测项目和变形监测项目的现状发展程度评价及发展趋势分析。实例分析表明:膨胀土的抗剪参数随含水率的增加而减小,且随干湿循环次数的增加,也会降低膨胀土的抗剪参数;在试验含水率范围内,膨胀土的膨胀力随含水率的增加而减小。据现场监测成果,力学监测和变形监测的规律性相近,两者均是具有较高的现状发展程度,程度等级为Ⅱ~Ⅲ级,且两者后续均具增加趋势,但力学监测项目的发展趋势等级相对较高。

Abstract:

To grasp the experimental performance of expansive soil and reasonably evaluate its support efficiency during foundation pit construction, taking the expansive soil foundation pit in Nanning area as the research background, the shear strength and expansion law of the expansive soil are first mastered through experimental analysis in this paper. Then, based on the on-site monitoring results of the foundation pit, the current development degree evaluation and development trend analysis of expansive soil mechanical monitoring projects and deformation monitoring projects are carried out. Example analysis shows that the shear parameters of expansive soil decrease with the increase of moisture content, moreover, with the increase of dry-wet cycles, the shear parameters of expansive soil also decrease. Within the range of experimental moisture content, the expansion force of expansive soil decreases with the increase of moisture content. According to on-site monitoring results, the regularity of mechanical monitoring and deformation monitoring is similar, both of them have a high level of current development, ranging from level II to level III, and both have an increasing trend in the future, however, the development trend level of mechanical monitoring projects is relatively higher.

参考文献

[1] 黄淦成,方平,王述明.膨胀土边坡稳定性分析及治理研究.人民长江,2019,50(增刊2):100~102,107.

[2] 王永军,孙连勇,黄永亮,等.扬州膨胀土地层深基坑受力与变形特性研究.现代隧道技术,2018,55(04):155~162.

[3] 唐洪亮,刘芳亮,黄永亮.膨胀土地区深基坑开挖模型试验与数值计算研究.公路,2018,63(06):336~341.

[4] 杨和平,唐咸远,王兴正,等.有荷干湿循环条件下不同膨胀土抗剪强度基本特性.岩土力学,2018,39(07):2311~ 2317.

[5] 徐丹,唐朝生,冷挺,等.干湿循环对非饱和膨胀土抗剪强度影响的试验研究.地学前缘,2018,25(01):286~296.

[6] 吴珺华,杨松.干湿循环下膨胀土基质吸力测定及其对抗剪强度影响试验研究.岩土力学,2017,38(03):678~684.

[7] 陈富林.成都膨胀土深基坑边坡支护研究:[学位论文].成都:西华大学,2017.

[8] 王娟,王兴科.软土地区基坑侧位移变形预警及预测.长江科学院院报,2021,38(08):91~96,103.

[9] 鞠兴华,刘禹阳.基于多元信息融合的基坑预警分级研究.水利水电技术(中英文),2021,52(01):129~136.

[10] 李常茂,祝和意.软土深基坑的空间变形特性分析及危险性评估.中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(01):116~121.

[11] 王雪妮,韩国锋.趋势项分离预测模型及重标度极差分析在深基坑变形预测中的应用研究.隧道建设,2017,37(08):990~996.

[12] 王娟,王兴科.组合预测及R/S分析在基坑变形趋势判断中的应用研究.长江科学院院报,2017,34(05):103~108.

基本信息:

DOI:

中图分类号:TU443

引用信息:

[1]吴必胜.膨胀土基坑的土体试验性能及变形预测分析[J].勘察科学技术,2025,No.260(01):32-38.

基金信息:

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文